
Emerald Ash Borer Info
Click here
Bill Botti's Tree Series
Click Here
Craig Kasmer's Wildlife Series
Click Here
|
Art and photos on this website may not be reproduced without written
permission of Michigan Forest Association. Other material may be
reprinted with appropriate credit.
|
Privacy Statement
|
Michigan Forests Magazine
Excerpts From Summer 2006 Issue
Conservation means the wise use of the earth
and its resources for the lasting good of men.-Gifford Pinchot |
|
MICHIGAN STATE
UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
By Bill Cook MSU Extension Service Forester
MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR RED PINE TYPES
Forest management practices vary considerably across forest types,
site conditions, market availability, and many other factors. There
simply is not any single way or best way to manage all forests, or even a
particular kind of forest. While nature is a dynamic system that defies
simple categorization, there remains a body of knowledge and experience
that can be very effectively applied.
For landowners, growing red pine can be quite rewarding. It's one of
the fastest- growing species in the Lake States. Plantations are
reasonably easy to establish, maintain, and thin. Old fields, abandoned
farms, and low quality hardwood sites are good places to plant red pine,
as long as the soil is well-drained.
Plantation establishment, maintenance, and culture require some
knowledge and planning. Working with a forester will certainly increase
the odds of success. The early years are critical. Vegetation competition, drought, and deer browsing pose the
greatest threats. Cost-share programs and federal tax incentives can help
with expenses. Red pine are very sensitive to sunlight conditions. They do
not tolerate shade. As stand canopies begin to close, growth slows
dramatically and lower branches begin to die and self-prune. To a certain
point, this self-pruning is a good thing. Nevertheless, to maximize growth
and maintain stand health, thinning is required. Red pine respond well
to well-maintained light conditions.
Many older plantations have been neglected. Persistent over-crowding
after stands reach about 60 feet will ruin a stand. The ratio of crown to
total tree height becomes so low that recovery may be impossible. When
only the top ten percent of the tree has needles, and the trees are not
likely to grow much more in height, the stand needs to be clearcut and
re-planted. It's too late for thinning.
The crown is where photosynthesis takes place. When crowns become very small, the trees produce only minimal
amounts of sugars. This stressful condition can attract bark beetles and
invite other health problems. Once trees approach the genetic limit of
height growth, those with small crowns cannot grow larger crowns. That's
why thinning at this point would not be productive.
Many of the plantations from the CCC days have reached sawtimber size.
Many more plantations started since then are also coming on-line. Over the
next decade or so, we can expect large volumes of red pine to move into
the market. The most valuable products will be utility poles, followed by
cabin logs, sawtimber, and pulpwood. Red pine is a versatile species with
excellent products throughout its life.
Red pine is one of the more maligned forest types in the region.
Conversely, many people consider these stands visually attractive. Both
perspectives are largely human constructs. While sometimes locally
abundant, the red pine forest type occupies only about five percent of our
forest cover in the Lake States.
Red pine seems to have gotten a bad rap for a lack of biodiversity and
the fact it often grows in rows.
While biodiversity within a stand may be low, the diversity added to
the greater landscape can be valuable. Red pine stands in a sea of
hardwoods offers habitat for species not otherwise likely to occur.
Early stages of red pine growth provide excellent shelter and escape cover
for many wildlife species.
As far as growing in rows, that's usually a temporary structure. Once
thinning within rows begins to happen, the stand will often take on a
visual character more like that of natural stands.
Plantations are an effective way to rapidly produce marketable fiber
and invest for future income. While they may not have the greatest value
to wildlife habitat, they do add to most landscapes. If we can accept open
fields, urban splatter, and agriculture; then a plantation should
certainly be preferable from environmental perspectives. Perhaps, red
pine deserves a second look.
Bill Cook Forester & Biologist
MSU Extension, Upper Peninsula 6005 J Road
Escanaba, MI 49829
906-786-1575, voice •
906-786-9370, fax
Email: cookwi@msu.edu
|
|
MICHIGAN STATE
UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
By Bill Cook MSU Extension Service Forester
MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR NORTHERN HARDWOOD TYPES
Forest management practices vary considerably across forest types,
site conditions, market availability, and many other factors. There
simply is not any single way or best way to manage all forests, or even a
particular kind of forest. While nature is a dynamic system that defies
simple categorization, there remains a body of knowledge and experience
that can be very effectively applied.
Northern hardwoods display this diversity more than
any other Lake States forest type. The term "northern hardwoods" refers to
forests dominated by sugar maple, basswood, beech, and yellow birch. There
are dozens of other possible components that vary widely. White pine and
hemlock are particularly important species for enhancing wildlife
habitat and are the focus of many forest "restoration" efforts.
Northern hardwoods are the dominant forest cover in
Michigan and Wisconsin. These associations are the final stage in several
vegetation succession pathways. As our forests age and mature, more and
more area becomes occupied by northern hardwoods, at the expense of other
forest types. Because major component species also have high monetary
values, some forest owners use management to push their forests more quickly
towards northern hardwoods.
Northern hardwoods can be managed using either all-aged or even-aged
systems. On more productive sites, all-aged management will produce the
highest quality timber and most resemble what many consider to be natural.
On less productive sites, even- aged systems frequently work well.
An all-aged, or uneven-aged, management system is what we often call
the selection system. Stands are entered every 10-15 years and a range
of trees are removed. The result is a better quality stand. The harvest
involves a mix of thinnings and high value trees, taken from all size
classes. This should not be confused with a "select cut" as is too often practiced. The difference lies in which trees are "selected." If
the harvest does not improve stand quality, then it is not good forestry.
Individual tree selection spreads the thinning and harvest more
uniformly across the stand. This version of the selection system maximizes
sugar maple regeneration and development. Group selection removes trees in
variable concentrations in order to increase tree species diversity,
especially those species that require more sunlight than sugar maple.
Selection management mimics the ecological processes that naturally work
in northern hardwoods.
Even-aged management in northern hardwoods can be variations of
shelterwood or clearcutting systems. While often considered less
desirable than the selection system, even-aged management has its place.
On many sites, high quality timber may not be achievable due to site
limitations. Clearcutting larger areas of northern hardwoods may be one
way to regenerate stands in areas where high deer densities destroy
regeneration produced through selection management.
Shelterwood harvests remove successive amounts of overstory with the
idea of stimulating regeneration and "nursing" the young trees into a
replacement stand. Once the new forest is obtained, the overstory is then
removed. The full sunlight then accelerates the growth of the new
forest. Shelterwood management works particularly well with certain other
forest types, such as oaks, but has applications in northern hardwoods, too.
Northern hardwoods, particularly sugar maple, produce some of the most
monetarily valuable trees in North America. Sawtimber and veneer are
typically bought from forest owners in units of 1000 board feet, or MBF.
In the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, high quality sugar maple can sell for
over $1000 per MBF. That means harvesting only a few hundred trees can net
several tens of thousands of dollars, every 10-15 years.
The key, of course, is "quality" in the trees. Growing sugar maple, and
certain other tree species, to meet high value specifications takes good
forest management on a productive site. The science is well understood and
the techniques are no secret. However, a stand in poor condition may
require several decades of recovery and professional management before a
high quality condition can be achieved. Management will produce a high
quality stand in less time and in greater abundance than leaving things to
nature.
Larger sugar maple trees are not necessarily more valuable. On many
of our soil types, discoloration and rotting agents be come present when
the trees are 14-16 inches in diameter. On other soils, this process may
not occur until trees grow to over 20 inches. Knowing the situation in
your area is important when determining how to maximize the dollar value
of a harvest. A number of other conditions introduce defect and quality
degrades. Variable markets can also influence what may or may not be
acceptable. Northern hardwood management can be the most complex among our
Lake States forests. Many variables must be evaluated and combined in
order to meet forest owner objectives. Timber marking requires considerable experience and knowledge. Timber harvesting requires a skilled
logger appropriately using equipment. Professional consultation becomes
more important with northern hardwoods than any other forest
type. However, the future of northern hardwoods looks good, especially if
you have the right forest on the right ground.
|
|
MOUNTAIN ASH - A TREE OF MANY USES.
Confusion exists when voicing concerns over the
crisis for ash trees from the invading Emerald Ash Borer. The Mountain
Ash, with its beautiful green foliage and bright red berries of fall, is a
species having nothing to fear from that insect pest, since this is an ash
tree in name only-not in family. The Mountain Ash (Pyrus Aucuparia, Gaertn.)
is not related to the true Ashes, but has derived its name from the
similarity of the leaves. In comparison to the true Ash, it is a small
tree, rarely more than 30 feet high. It belongs to the order Rosacece and
is distinguished from its immediate relations the Pear, Crab Apple, White
Beam and Wild Service Tree by its regularly pinnate, Ashlike leaves. It is
generally distributed over the country in its wild state, but is also much
cultivated as an ornamental tree.
All parts of the tree are astringent and it has been used in tanning
and for dyeing black. When cut, the Mountain Ash yields poles and hoops
for barrels.
Both the bark and fruit have medicinal properties. The fruit is rather
globose, with teeth at the apex and two to three seeded cells. They are
used medicinally in either the fresh or the dried state.
In herbal medicine, a decoction of the bark is given for diarrhea. The
ripe berries furnish an acidulous and astringent gargle for sore throats
and inflamed tonsils. For their anti-scorbutic properties, they have been
used in preventing scurvy. The astringent infusion is used as a remedy
in haemorrhoids and strangury.
The fruit is a favorite food of birds. A delicious jelly is also made
from the berries, which is excellent with cold game or wild fowl, and a
wholesome kind of perry or cider can also be made from them.
In Northern Europe, where Mountain Ash are common, the berries are
dried and when fermented yield a strong spirit. The Welsh used to brew an
ale from the berries, the secret of which is now lost.
Fall in woodlands of the north finds the mountain ash's intensely
bright red berries ripening, and with its lush green foliage they give a
preview of the Christmas colors to come.
|
|