Some Estate Planning Considerations
By Jim Burns
Poor Judd is dead! During his working life, he was able to
purchase a number of timberland tracts, which now total 200-acres.
He loved these lands and was proud of the good job of forest
management he had done which had resulted in growing a large volume
of high-quality sawtimber. The rest of his assets included life
insurance, investments in stock, certificates of deposit and his
house.
Since his wife passed away a few years ago, Judd Jr., his
oldest son, had been working with him in the management of his
timberlands. Judd always intended to leave the timberland to this
son so the careful management of these assets would continue
unchanged into the future. The remainder of Judd Sr.’s assets was to
be split between his daughter, Sara and youngest son, Percy who had
no interest in the timberlands.
Judd was always busy with work and
never got around to having a will prepared by his attorney. He also
envisioned “the kids will be reasonable and know what I want”.
Unfortunately, without a will, the entire estate is now going to the
children as 1/3 undivided interests each. Fathers’ intentions mean
very little at this point. Are the children “reasonable”? Read on.
The quarrelling usually commences at the funeral or shortly
thereafter. Judd Jr. and his son have been the only ones working
with the timberlands and expected to inherit the timberlands. Percy,
who lives in San Francisco, claims that Dad had given him (no deed)
a favorite 40-acre tract and even called it “Percy’s 40". Other than
that, he wants a 1/3 interest in all remaining assets.
The biggest
surprise is Sara, who hasn’t seen her older brother or father in at
least 25-years because she considered them “timber beasts” as they
killed trees and called it management! Sara belongs to every loony
“green” organization on the planet. She has completed her homework,
however, and calculates that her 1/3 interest in the timber comes
out to a cool $200,000.00 for the right to clear-cut the 200-acres.
She has a contract from Quick Bucks Logging Company to prove it! The
other part to her plan is to then sell the cut-over acreage and
other assets. Poor Judd is really rolling in his grave!
Three heirs,
three different viewpoints and excellent paying work for three
lawyers. Is this an unusual scenario about a dysfunctional family?
No! Based upon my years of experience as a forester and timber tax
preparer, I would say this is the usual outcome. Even with the
existence of a will there can be problems.
In this example,
splitting-up the investments, insurance, CD’s and even equipment is
not that big a problem, but real estate is. Anytime timberland is
involved, all kinds of problems will transpire unless some legally
binding direction has been pre-determined and codified.
There are
numerous legal entities available which can be used to ensure that
your future vision for the management and financial benefits of the
timberland can be passed on to your heirs without causing an
acrimonious end to the family. Trusts, LLC’s and partnerships would
be a few examples. My objective in this article is not to advise
which legal structure would be the best for you, but in realizing
that one size does not fit all situations, I urge you to seek legal
and accounting advice in this matter.
First of all, the advice I
would like you to take to your attorney is the fact that timber is a
capital asset and income from sales of timber should be reported as
capital gain for federal and state income taxes. Reporting as such,
you are entitled to take a Timber Depletion Deduction from the gross
revenue to arrive at a net profit which is then taxed at the lower
federal capital gain tax rates.
The depletion deduction is
calculated from the cost basis of timberland, meaning; the higher
the cost basis, the less income tax you will pay and, the lower the
cost basis, the more income tax you pay. For example, if Judd’s
father had purchased the timberland in 1945 for $100.00 – that would
be his cost basis. Let’s say, in 1970 the father gives the land to
Judd. The original cost basis goes with the gift, so Judd’s cost
basis is only $100.00. Now, if Judd gifted the land to Judd Jr.
before his death, Junior would only have a $100.00 cost basis in
land that is worth a half million dollars today.
The better plan,
tax-wise, would be to allow Judd Jr. to inherit the land which would
give him a new cost basis of a half million dollars and little or no
capital gain whenever he sold timber. Gifting timberland with a low
cost basis is usually not a good idea.
The second tip you need to
take to your lawyer concerns the actual future management of the
timberland. Spell it out. If you have a written forest management
plan, attach it as part of the legal document controlling the
property. The other important part of this is to designate one
person as the decision making authority. Timber sales are going to
be made, contracts signed, property taxes incurred, easements, etc.
If two people are involved with decision making authority, the
entire management process will go into slow-motion and perhaps
cease. With three or more people involved, nothing will happen.
Remember, when there are multiple heirs to timberland, the odds of
having a ringer involved like “Sara” are high.
Jim Burns is a professional forester who owns and operates
Burns Timber Tax Services and works in conjunction with Susan
Metcalfe at Metcalfe Forestry LLC. For more information, call Susan
at (989) 348-3596 with your questions.
TIMBER TAX TIP Myth or Fact: I don’t have to file a Form T if I
have an occasional timber sale.
Fact: Actually, this is true. But you CANNOT show a depletion
deduction (reduce your cost basis & reduce your tax liability on
your timber sale revenue) with out filing a Form T. In other words,
you must pay tax on the entire amount you earned from your timber
sale if you choose not to file a Form T. Remember, as a landowner,
you can amend your timber taxes up to three years prior.
|